From no_spam_pleas–(at)–n_a_diet.com Tue Jun 24 00:05:41 CDT 1997
Article: 54053 of alt.guitar.amps
Path: geraldo.cc.utexas.edu!cs.utexas.edu!ennfs.eas.asu.edu!nntp.dist.maricopa.edu!usenet
From: Dale VanZile
Newsgroups: alt.guitar.amps
Subject: Re: What’s the “best” all around amp to use with a Les Paul Standard?
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 1997 14:03:27 -0700
Organization: Maricopa Community Colleges
Lines: 71
Message-ID: <33AEE482.7CD--(at)--n_a_diet.com>
References: <33a75f0a.202352--(at)--ews.alt.net> <19970620095901.FAA1357--(at)--adder02.news.aol.com>
Reply-To: no_spam_pleas–(at)–n_a_diet.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: mac49.stu-serv-2.sc.maricopa.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (Macintosh; I; PPC)
Xref: geraldo.cc.utexas.edu alt.guitar.amps:54053
TubeBlastr wrote:
> By the way, the amps listed above with the parallel effects loop
> aren’t my first choice in amps. You could just get a Fender Deluxe
> Reverb amp and put a distortion pedal in front of it. This would
> give you great sounds in a small room, but it wouldn’t take full
> advantage of your effects processor because it doesn’t have an
> effects loop at all.
Actually, it does, sort-of. The reverb circuit is in a parallel
loop style setup. If you hook a male-RCA->dual-female-RCAs y-cord
to the reverb driver output (marked “reverb input”) you’ll get a
nice effects send out of the deal, provided you have the appropriate
RCA->1/4″ adapter cord. Same deal on the reverb return (or leave
the return unhooked if you want to use just the digital reverb/
FX…) and then the reverb knob is now an “effects” knob. Don’t
unhook the reverb tank from the driver side unless you have a 8-15
ohm/5-10W load resistor to replace it. The reverb driver is a small
tube power amp using both halves of a 12AT7 in a parallel single-
ended configuration. It is transformer coupled, and _will_ blow up
if not loaded with something approaching the correct load.
> You certainly have a lot of options with $1500 to play with.
Another alternative is the Peavey TubeFEX rack preamp/processor, a
small used stereo power amp (like a Crown D-75, for example), and
either a stereo guitar speaker cab or a pair of 1×12″ or 1×15″ PA
cabinets. The TubeFEX has great sounds for electric guitar, and can
also do wonders for an acoustic guitar if played through a full-range
speaker setup. Heck, it doesn’t sound that bad for acoustic even
with guitar speakers. If you use full-range speakers, the TubeFEX
has a good cabinet emulator, with several different choices of cab
configurations (2×12″ open-back, 2×12″ closed-back, 4×12″, 4×12″
“British”). The TubeFEX also has a nice FX loop into which you can
plug your old FX processor. The Crown is 40W per side into 8 ohms,
or 55W per side into 4 ohms. This should cut it in almost any band,
unless you have a really loud drummer.
The TubeFEX can be had for around $700 if you have a decent dealer
near you, and a used D-75 is about $200. I think Carvin sells a
couple different PA cabs that can be had for around $300 each, which
fits nicely into your $1500 budget.
I have the TubeFEX and a Crown D-75 (as well as a 60W Mk. II-C Boogie
combo and a Carvin 4×12″ cab), and I’m really happy with the sounds
I’m getting from it. I play mostly electric, with a Lone Star Strat
and a Hamer Special (with a Duncan JB in the bridge slot).
I plug directly into the TubeFEX (via a VOX wah), then put the FX
send from the TubeFEX into the Boogie’s FX loop return for my 100%
dry sound. Then I take the post-MV “preamp-out/power-amp-in” output
back into the TubeFEX’s FX return and into a Quadraverb 2. These
are then mixed into the D-75 and the top two speakers of the 4×12″.
The Boogie powers the bottom two speakers of the 4×12″ as well as
its own speaker.
One caveat, though: Peavey’s customer service/tech support dept. leaves
much to be desired. I haven’t had any problems, but I had a couple
questions which have gone several months unanswered….
Dutch
—
*****LEGAL NOTICE TO ALL BULK E-MAILERS***** NOTICE TO BULK EMAILERS: Pursuant to US Code, Title 47, Chapter 5,
reply to
Subchapter II, 227, any and all nonsolicited commercial E-mail sent
to this address is subject to a download and archival fee in the
amount of $500 US. E-mailing denotes acceptance of these terms.
