From unclespo–(at)–arthlink.net Sat Dec 27 10:19:09 CST 1997
Article: 77544 of alt.guitar.amps
Path: geraldo.cc.utexas.edu!cs.utexas.edu!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.bbnplanet.com!howland.erols.net!portc02.blue.aol.com!prodigy.com!nntp.earthlink.net!usenet
From: unclespot
Newsgroups: alt.guitar.amps
Subject: Re: Utah speakers in BF Pro reverb
Date: Fri, 26 Dec 1997 19:50:52 -0800
Organization: Uncle Spot Inc. (http://home.earthlink.net/~unclespot/)
Lines: 12
Message-ID: <34A47B1C.50A--(at)--arthlink.net>
References: <67vta4$rsj$--(at)--emdwu11.telemedia.de>
Reply-To: unclespo–(at)–arthlink.net
NNTP-Posting-Host: 153.37.7.109
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01Gold (Win95; I)
Xref: geraldo.cc.utexas.edu alt.guitar.amps:77544

Ingo,
I’ve seen Utah, Oxford, and Jensen speakers common in Pro Reverbs.
When I first started repairing Fender amps in the late ’60s some people
put some JBL D120s in their Pros also (but, to my knowledge they did NOT
come from Fender like that, like the Twin-Reverbs did – I may be wrong,
but have never seen them stock…)
As far as what sounded the best…most people liked the Jensens, then
the Utah, and then the Oxfords… they all seemed pretty close to me at
the time. Now I’ve been replacing them with WeberVST P12N or P12Q
speakers… they are a great replacement speaker for a gigging musician!
If you were a collector I’d recomend a “stock” speaker…
later, Ron